http://blog.retro-classics.co.nz/?p=3153 Sun, 21 Aug 2016 23:15:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://blog.retro-classics.co.nz/?p=3153&cpage=1#comment-11813 Irving Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:34:34 +0000 http://blog.retro-classics.co.nz/?p=3153#comment-11813 this is rediculous. is there n e reason for it? its not like the tyre can pop off the bead that easy. also negates the recomended tyre size for a vehicle which would most likely mean a stretch on a wide rim. the recommended tyre sizes on my poster at work go smaller than those also. what about the tyres that are designed specificly for stretched fitment? would it not be stupid to bypass the manufactures recomendations aswell?

]]> http://blog.retro-classics.co.nz/?p=3153&cpage=1#comment-11729 kyteler Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:07:27 +0000 http://blog.retro-classics.co.nz/?p=3153#comment-11729 Yeah, I realise this. The interesting point is that it’s only recently that I’ve heard about that people are getting denied their certification due to it. Who knows though, could be people being denied since then. Have to wonder about the bucket boys. They get dispensations to run fenderless with certain parameters, I wonder whether there’s something similar with this, and what is on page 2??

]]> http://blog.retro-classics.co.nz/?p=3153&cpage=1#comment-11727 Zeb — Ｒ Ｉ Ｖ Ｅ Ｒ Ｓ Ｉ Ｄ Ｅ Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:08:23 +0000 http://blog.retro-classics.co.nz/?p=3153#comment-11727 Check the date on that stz man

]]>